Fifty years after her mysterious death, Marilyn Monroeâs image remains as profitable as ever. In 1999, the dress she wore to sing âHappy Birthday, Mr. Presidentâ to John F. Kennedy sold at auction for $1.26 million. Forbes magazine lists her as #3 on their âTop-Earning Dead Celebritiesâ list (topped only by Michael Jackson and Elvis Presley). And In 2009, a Japanese man paid $4.6 million for the crypt directly above hers at Westwood Village Memorial Park Cemetery in Los Angeles. (Some people really do have too much money.)
Now Marilyn is in the news again, this time for the financial consequences of her tax planning. If Hollywood made the story into a movie, nobody would believe it.
When Marilyn died in 1962, she left $40,000 to her secretary, 25% of her estate to her psychiatrist, and the remaining 75% of her estate, including the âresiduary,â to her friend and acting coach, Lee Strasberg. The estate sat in probate for 41 years before finally settling, with the bulk of the assets eventually passing to an entity called Monroe, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company managed by Strasbergâs widow. (It might be worth mentioning here that Alexander the Great took just ten years to conquer the entire civilized world.)
Marilyn died at her home in California. However, she executed her Last Will and Testament in New York, where she owned an apartment at 444 E. 57th Street, and named a New York attorney, Aaron Frosch, as her executor. Frosch consistently treated Marilyn as a New York resident in order to avoid California estate taxes. And it worked, her estate paid just $777.63 in inheritance taxes there.
Fast forward to 2005. That year, the new LLC set up to manage the estateâs assets sued the heirs of several photographers who had taken pictures of Marilyn while she was still alive, heirs who were licensing those images for commercial use. Marilynâs estate argued that this violated her âright of publicity,â which included their rights to control the commercial use of Marilynâs name, her image, her likeness, and other aspects of her identity. The heirs, in turn, countersued, arguing that Monroe, LLC didnât own the starâs right to publicity.
A district court in California declared that at the time of her death, the state didnât recognize any such right of publicity, and ruled in favor of the photographersâ heirs. Just one month after that decision, California passed a law creating a posthumous right to publicity that would be transferable to Marilynâs estate. Armed with the new law, the estateâs attorneys went back to court to overturn their previous decision. Not so fast, the Court said. Yes, the California law would let Marilynâs estate inherit her right to publicity, if she had been a California resident at her death. But she didnât die a California resident, she died a New York resident and New York doesnât recognize a right to publicity.
Last month, the U.S. Circuit Court for the Ninth District issued what should hopefully be the last word, just over 50 years after her death. âWe conclude that because Monroeâs executors consistently represented during the probate proceedings and elsewhere that she was domiciled in New York at her death to avoid payment of California estate taxes, among other things, appellants are judicially estopped from asserting Californiaâs posthumous right of publicity.â In other words, go pound sand.
Hereâs the lesson. Sometimes, avoiding tax shouldnât be our most important goal. Sometimes, focusing on taxes means letting the tail wag the dog. And sometimes, our job is to help you put taxes in the right perspective. In Marilyn Monroeâs case, her executor made a smart decision to treat her as a New York resident, and succeeded in avoiding California tax. He certainly couldnât have foreseen the development of any right to publicity, and he canât be said to have done anything wrong. But focusing solely on taxes did cost Marilynâs estate big in the end. So email us when youâve got big decisions to make. Weâll help you avoid making similar mistakes!
Donna Bordeaux, CPA with Calculated Moves
Creativity and CPAs donât generally go together. Â Most people think of CPAs as nerdy accountants who canât talk with people. Â Well, itâs time to break that stereotype. Â Lively, friendly and knowledgeable can be a part of your relationship with your CPA as demonstrated by Donna and Chad Bordeaux. Â They have over 50 years of combined experience as entrepreneurial CPAs. Â Theyâve owned businesses and helped business owners exceed their wildest dreams. Â They have been able to help businesses earn many times more profit than the average business in the same industry and are passionate about helping industries that help families build great memories.
